“The Office” fans will love these fun Microsoft UK training videos with Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant:
http://download.ifilm.com/qt/portal/2751040_200.mov
http://download.ifilm.com/qt/portal/2751041_200.mov
From: Inside Microsoft.
I understand The Office made it over to the USA too, so hopefully this isn’t completely lost on my US readers. But even if you’ve never heard of The Office I think you’ll find these videos amusing. Don’t miss the out-takes at the end, after the credits.
It’s always fascinating and useful to find out how other people use Macro Scheduler. As you probably know I frequently post Success Stories here on this blog. There’s also a really interesting topic on the forums, here, where people can post information about how Macro Scheduler helps them.
I’ve just scanned through the forum post and made a short list summarising some of the ways people are using Macro Scheduler:
Read more, or post your own experiences here: Tell us how Macro Scheduler helps you, what you use it for.
If you have a Macro Scheduler Success Story and would like to see it included on this blog please contact me. At the end of the year we will choose our favourite story and the winner will receive $100 worth of Amazon Vouchers.
As a company that strives to provide good support I find it frustrating when we receive requests for support that make it hard for us to give it. What do I mean? Well here’s an example. The other day I received an email that had no subject line but a short message. The sender had also embedded an image in the email. The image didn’t get through because it wasn’t a proper attachment. I replied and asked them to resend the image as an attachment. Later that day I got another email, not a reply – a new email, again with no subject and this time with just an attachment of an image. Now because it wasn’t a particularly busy day for support and because I was the one who replied to this person’s previous email and recognised the email address I was able to mentally piece the two emails together. So I was able to reply to the second email.
Later that day we received yet another email – again, not a reply – containing new information, with no reference to the original problem. It took me a while to figure out what the email was about, which I only did because I vaguely recognised the sender as being the one that had emailed us earlier. Had someone else answered it they wouldn’t have had a clue what the problem was and the whole process would have been restarted. All this occurred despite the fact that our autoresponders and replies clearly ask for follow up information to be sent as a reply with the original message intact.
Each time a new email comes in it is assigned a ticket number. By replying to an email and leaving the message intact it stays on the same ticket and we can see the history of messages, so we can see the support history and know what the new information is referring to. But if a new email is sent each time we don’t know what it is about. If it were a busy day with lots of emails coming in we’d have no idea what the new email is about, especially if the original problem is not even mentioned in it. Furthermore if a different support rep reads the email, then as far as he is concerned it’s a new problem with no helpful information. The long shot is it takes longer for the customer to get a useful response.
So, here are my tips for sending a support request by email and ensuring you get a quick and helpful response. This list is valid whoever you are contacting, not just for us.
I hope this helps you help us help you 🙂
I suppose cracks are an occupational hazard. Sooner or later someone is going to crack your software. It is just a fact of life. There’s actually no way to prevent it. Some protection methods are better than others but the best hackers will always find a way round them. There’s a limit to how much time should be spent on beefing up protection that can never be 100% secure anyway.
But cracks can be dangerous. Many contain viruses or Trojans. The hacker will insert malicious code and the cracked software becomes a trojan horse for the unwitting and will infest their computer. Even those that don’t have viruses in them may have problems. Sometimes the hacker may miss hidden protection mechanisms which don’t manifest themselves clearly. When these surface the software is likely to crash and could potentially harm your computer. The crack could cause instability due to insecure modifications to the executable. It is therefore unwise to rely on cracked software. Furthermore, don’t expect to get support from the developer if you are using illegally obtained software.
How can you tell if the software you have downloaded is cracked? First, look to see if the Digital Signature is intact. Right click on the file in Windows Explorer. Is there a Digital Signature tab? For example you will see MJT Net Ltd in the list of signatures if you right click on the Macro Scheduler executable. If the file has been tampered with in some way the signature won’t be there. Without the signature Windows XP will pop up warnings when you try to run it. If the signature is not there it means someone has modified the executable and it could therefore be buggy or virus ridden. Delete it and download the authorised version from the official source instead.
What really annoys me about hackers is not their ability to hack the software itself. Ethical hackers tell you they have circumvented the protection but do nothing more. They deserve respect for their abilities. But those that then post the software on download sites deserve nothing. These people are potentially stealing developers’ livelihoods. What they often don’t consider is who is behind the software they have cracked. Not all developers are huge, faceless corporations like Microsoft. Many developers are small companies, working long hours to pay their mortgages and bills. People like us. Small companies who develop their wares to make an honest buck and ensure the security and safety of their families. Not rich people. Ordinary people selling their software to make ends meet. By hacking our software and making it available to people on the web hackers are sending the message that it is alright to take income away from us. I ask you – what have we ever done to these people? What makes them think it is alright to take income away from us honest, hard working people?
A far more worrying trend is the increase in credit card fraud, and fully registered versions of software appearing on file download sites and file sharing networks. Why bother trying to hack software when all you need to do is buy the full version with a stolen credit card and then give it away? But if you ever find full versions on file sharing networks consider how it got there. Credit card fraud is organised crime. Stolen credit card numbers are obtained/sourced by networks of organised criminals. One thing is for sure – these people don’t just deal in stolen credit cards. They are often involved in far worse – drug trafficking, people smuggling, violent crime etc. Ok, the person that used the stolen credit card to obtain the software might not be one of these people. But chances are the credit card was obtained by someone who is, or at the very least is linked to someone who is.
So next time you consider downloading an illegal copy of some piece of software, think about how it got there. Think about what you are endorsing and who you are supporting. Think about the ordinary software author who works hard every day, just like you do, to pay his mortgage. And think about the victims of those that steal credit cards – ordinary people just like you.
I read this interesting article the other day: “Don’t give in to feature demands!”.
It is true that we can’t always add all the features everyone wants. If we added everything ever requested the product would get bloated in all directions. There’s no point adding a complicated new feature if only 1% of users will use it. So how do we decide what new features to add? Well, we listen to all feedback/suggestions and try to implement those that enhance the core of the product for the benefit of the majority. Stuff that will only benefit one or two users is better off as an external library.
We read all the posts in the Enhancement Suggestions forum and in Bugtracker and try to incorporate as many of those suggestions as possible into future releases. Major changes, such as new script commands and interface changes usually get added only to major updates. Smaller changes often make it into point releases. So if you have a feature suggestion post it to Enhancement Suggestions. If you like you can also create a poll there to see what other people think.
If you look at the history list you will see we are continuously adding new script commands and constantly improving the product. The product is very much moulded by its users and any longstanding customer will tell you how most new features are a result of customer feedback. Macro Scheduler really wouldn’t be here today were it not for the user feedback that guides us.
But how do you know which of the suggested features are being worked on right now? Well, when appropriate we will make an announcement. You can also view the status in Bugtracker to see if it is assigned or fixed in next release. But initially we prefer not to make any promises. If we were to promise a newly suggested feature without first looking at the feasibility and analysing its impact on the product we may end up breaking our promise. I don’t believe in making promises that can’t be kept, so, just in case, I prefer not to make promises at all, and then over-deliver 😉 One thing I will say is that Macro Scheduler 9.0 will be even easier to use, both for newcomers and experienced scripters. And there are some other exciting developments in the works …
Some nice reviews of Macro Scheduler at SoftPile, here.
And some great reviews at Download.com too.
Some not so great ones too though 🙁 Some are reasonably balanced. After all, I believe in the saying “Horses for Courses” – one can’t expect everyone to like our software. But I was a bit upset about that one saying we refused to honour a refund. I have no recollection of ever refusing a refund where we were unable to provide a solution and I can find no record of ever being “threatened”.
Funny thing is the title of the review says “money back guarantee not honored” yet the body of the review says they did get their money back. Oh well, I guess there’s just no pleasing some people!
Yikes, it’s hot here in SW England. Someone told me today will be hottest day on record since 1911! But in the post this morning was a promotional letter from a company selling solar energy systems touting ways to reduce our heating bills. I can’t see that campaign being overly successful right now!
I just received a reply to my “Macro Scheduler Resume” mailing that I sent out a few weeks ago. The sender was complaining about an incorrect spelling and suggested that my email would be seen as unprofessional if forwarded to other businesses. His complaint was that I used the spelling “Organisation”.
The fact is I am British. I live in England and was educated here. MJT Net Ltd is a British company, registered in England and Wales. Organisation is the correct British spelling. I make no apologies for being British and I can’t help automatically using British spelling when I write.
Definition and Spelling:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/organisation
Should I have used the spelling “Organization” in an email sent to my customers? Well, in our software and documentation we do TRY to use American English spellings as much as possible, just because we know that around 50% of our customers are in the USA. But from time to time we might miss one or two. After all we can’t help using British spelling and may not even realise (realize) there is a different American variant sometimes. Also a large number of our customers are European, consisting of many British. So what should we do? Write different versions of the software and documentation for different people? That would be quite inefficient and is simply not practical (although, with the help of others, we are slowly getting our software and documentation translated into other languages).
Anyway, when I write emails I prefer to write in a personal style. My emails are from ME, not a marketing person or a robot. I actually think that in this day and age this is quite important. So I will write using my own style. That means I will use British spellings.
The email I sent was designed to be forwarded on to others. It was a light-hearted way at, hopefully, encouraging a bit of word-of-mouth and introducing customers to our affiliate schemes, whereby they can benefit from recommending our software to others. But there was certainly no obligation to do so. And of course there is also nothing to stop anyone modifying, localising (localizing) or even translating it for their chosen recipients.
So, I make no apologies for being British and for writing the way I was taught to write.
The other day a friend of mine phoned me. He was trying to install the software that came with his new Nokia mobile phone. He said he was beginning to go mad. He just couldn’t see what he was missing. He said that when he started the installer a screen came up with a license agreement which he had to confirm. But the “Next” button was grayed out. He couldn’t continue. He couldn’t see what he had to do to continue. He was at the end of his tether, so he phoned me.
I set up a BeamYourScreen session and connected up to his PC and started the installer. I could see what he meant. The installer was kind of metallic. All the controls and objects looked completely unlike anything I had ever seen before. No idea why, because I wouldn’t even say it looked “cool”. When we got to the license screen the continue button was disabled. I noticed a tiny (really tiny) little round thing to the right of the license text, on a kind of dashed vertical line. I clicked on it and was able to drag it down. Yep, sure enough it was a scroll bar and when we got to the bottom the continue button became enabled.
Now, it took me only a few moments, but it was not immediately obvious. Gerry was kicking himself and felt a bit embarrassed but I don’t think he should have felt that way. None of the objects on the screen looked like familiar Windows objects. The scroll bar was obscure and completely unlike a regular scroll bar. There’s no reason why Gerry should have known immediately what he was supposed to do. He uses Windows and was installing software for Windows. He knows how Windows works and what Windows scroll bars look like. He shouldn’t be expected to have to use an unknown, alien, design.
If you are developing software for Windows then it should LOOK like Windows. There’s a reason why Windows uses standard controls and a standard look and feel. Sure, colours and fonts can be changed, but that’s up to the user. A Windows app should adjust automatically to follow the user’s selected layout. An application should not make up a whole new look and feel. Whatever you may think of the Windows user interface, no matter how much a designer may dislike the way Windows looks … well that’s tough! You’re designing for Windows, so that is how it has to be. And surely you want your customers to know how to use your software! Surely that’s what is important. Therefore your software should look familiar. It should use standard Windows objects and follow standard Windows conventions. My mate was close to going back to the shop and changing his Nokia for another phone because he couldn’t install the software that let him connect his laptop to the ‘net like he wanted.
Fine, supply skins that let your users change the look and feel of your application, but do this AFTER it has installed. What is the point of an installer that looks alien and doesn’t follow the Windows look and feel? Users shouldn’t have to learn a whole new user interface design just to install your software. Frankly, Nokia should know better. The interfaces their phones use are widely regarded as the most user friendly. But when they write software for PCs they shouldn’t reinvent the Windows interface!
A page on Microsoft’s website currently lists almost 100 cases they are taking against software pirates that have been discovered through Windows Genuine Advantage. You can click on each case and see more details of their alleged crimes.
This could be rather embarassing for companies that are distributing illegal copies of Microsoft Software and the details could be found by potential shoppers when searching the web for information on these firms. If you’re looking to buy Microsoft Software check this out first and avoid these people. It will be interesting to see how effective this public shaming approach turns out to be.
