Hi, Can't we use MACRO instead of Include here? Can I try Macro>b.scp /a to do the same? (So that I can avoid the variable collisions) I tried Include>b.s cp in a.scp. (But it didnt work) But after I tried Include>%SCRIPT_DIR%\b.scp . Do we need to mention %SCRIPT_DIR% before calling any macro(even ...

Thanks..

But how to distinguish between the local variables with same name? Is there any provision to avoid collision like we use scope resolution operator in different languages?

Hi All, I am totally new to Macro Scheduler. I don't have much time to explore it also:( . But I used some similar kind of tool before and found difficulties after compiling the scripts to execuatble (so that it can run on any machine). Suppose I have two scripts A.scp and B.scp. A.scp calls B.scp i...