(Macro Scheduler) costs a fraction of what WinRunner and other competing test tools on the market cost, and it saves money in other ways as well. The other tools generally require a license for every machine we run our test on. With Macro Scheduler, we can create compiled-macros. So, say, we have a team of five testers developing scripts on five licenses. But we want to run tests very quickly on 20 machines. Well, then, we could put compiled-macros on those 20 machines and run the test very quickly, at no additional cost.
We believe (Macro Scheduler) is going to greatly decrease our maintenance cost because it will simplify our scripts---so we will have fewer workarounds. And it will let us use the same method, image recognition, for writing all our scripts---whether it's a web app or client server ... By using one method, we can start including more testers and get our manual testers involved in creating some of their own automation.

